How reliable does en.Wikipedia think it is? According to their article on reliability of Wikipedia, “A 2013 study research of about 490 articles (245 pairs) from Britannica and the English Wikipedia showed that 90% of the articles on Wikipedia exhibited equal or superior quality.[unreliable source?]”
This is sourced to a blog.
But according to en.Wikipedia, blogs are generally not reliable.
What do you think? A self-published, non-peer reviewed, blog about Wikipedia should be used as a source in an article to discuss how reliable Wikipedia is?